Posted by: Dr. Grover B. Proctor, Jr. | 2 July 2010

‘Airbender’ equals Career-Killer ?


I promised my two nieces that I would take them to see The Last Airbender when they visit us next week. Both of these bright, beautiful young ladies are huge fans of Japanese anime (an interest I share with them on a smaller scale), and I had previously watched the English-dubbed-over-Japanese original anime series Avatar: The Last Airbender with them.

The Last AirbenderBeing the doting uncle that I am, undoubtedly I’ll fulfill my pledge, and we’ll all trek to the local digital showing of M. Night Shyamalan’s CGI-heavy live-action re-make. But the critics have not given me much hope of being cinematically satisfied.

You can read below the litany of critics verbally spitting on Shyamalan’sAirbender (netting it a paltry Metacritic rating of 20, out of 100 !). Apparently, not even the presence of Dev Patel, the engaging hero of Slumdog Millionaire, could save the production. Perhaps the unkindest cut of all from a critic was in the St. Louis Post Dispatch, which called the film “a toxic potion that will put children to sleep and kill Shyamalan’s career.” Ouch!

However bad this Anime-to-Live-Action melange turns out to be, let me urge you not to cast other cinematic anime gems out with the sewage. (Have I mixed enough metaphors here?)

From one Japanese production house in particular, and out of its founder’s imaginative genius, have come several anime films that can stand with much of the best of modern cinema.

Writer / director / producer / animation pioneer Hayao Miyazaki and his Studio Ghibli (pronounced “jibb-lee”) have given us a truly marvelous body of work — comprising some of the most wildly inventive and beautifully creative animation films ever made. Miyazaki (Pixar Studio founder John Lasseter admires him to the point of hero worship) is never formulaic; each film is unique from its siblings and worthy of multiple viewings. Here are eight of his masterpieces:

Hayao Miyazaki

Hayao Miyazaki

(The links behind each name above will take you to a trailer for that film. Happy viewing!)

So, whether M. Night Shyamalan’s career has taken a nose-dive (and he has besmirched the anime genre), or whether he survives this univerally acclaimed dud, we still have the effervescent glory of the best of Japanese anime to fall back on.

The Last Airbender

The Last Airbender

"You are here."

METACRITIC RATING: 20
( Generally Unfavorable Reviews )

Genres: Adventure | Family/Kids | Fantasy | War
Directed by: M. Night Shyamalan
Starring: Noah Ringer, Nicola Peltz, Jackson Rathbone, Dev Patel
Running Time: 103 minutes
Rating: PG for fantasy action violence

Air, Water, Earth, Fire. Four nations tied by destiny when the Fire Nation launches a brutal war against the others. A century has passed with no hope in sight to change the path of this destruction. Caught between combat and courage, Aang discovers he is the lone Avatar with the power to manipulate all four elements. Aang teams with Katara, a Waterbender, and her brother, Sokka, to restore balance to their war-torn world. (Paramount Pictures)

Chicago Sun-Times Roger Ebert:
The Last Airbender is an agonizing experience in every category I can think of and others still waiting to be invented.

Boston Globe Ty Burr:
The Last Airbender is dreadful, an incomprehensible fantasy-action epic that makes the 2007 film The Golden Compass, a similarly botched adaptation of a beloved property from another medium, look like a four-star classic.

Boxoffice Magazine Pam Grady:
The problems begin with Shyamalan’s script, which is an orgy of exposition. The characters explain and explain and explain some more, points driven home with the subtlety of a jackhammer.

Posted by: Dr. Grover B. Proctor, Jr. | 26 May 2010

A Three-Dimensional ‘Thor’


It’s True Confessions time, and I have two of them today.

First, when I was a wee lad my only comic book interest (this is before they became known as “graphic novels”) was the Thor series from Marvel.

Modern myths of Krypton and Gotham City aside, I remember being intrigued with the fact that here was a contemporary “superhero” with classic, historical literary roots, which made the story have far more appeal to me.

And the second confession is that, even today, I have an undiagnosed but authentic approach-avoidance relationship with superhero films. (Okay, we all have our guilty pleasures, don’t we?)

So imagine my surprise when those few of us who sat through the interminable credits of Iron Man 2 saw an appended scene at the very end, in which the camera pans down and gives the vigilant viewer (it fades to black quickly) a glimpse of — wait for it — Thor’s hammer! (A true case of non sequitur meets deus ex machina !)

Comic book Thor

Comic book Thor

I took this to mean that the “Comic-Book-to-Movie” Hollywood juggernaut had finally discovered another potentially lucrative franchise, and my first excited thought was, “What took them so long?”

So, yes, there is a live-action film version of Thor, currently set for release 6 May 2011, which is now listed as in “post-production” — meaning they’ve finished the major shooting, and it’s time to hunker down for a year’s worth of CGI, thank you very much.

The movie, directed by Sir Kenneth Branagh, will star relative newcomer Chris Hemsworth (Star Trek) as both the be-hammered Norse god of thunder and (from the conceit of the comic book) his alter ego Dr. Donald Blake.

Natalie Portman will play Blake’s love interest Jane Foster, upgraded from her comic book career as a nurse to a21st-century PC-appropriate “doctor/scientist type” for the film.

Other cinematic gods in this film’s pantheon include Sir Anthony Hopkins (Odin) and Rene Russo (Frigga).

So, we wait for the digital 3D film so we may involuntarily gasp and duck when Thor throws his hammer directly at us. (You know he will!) Approach-avoidance, indeed!

Thor

Chris Hemsworth as Thor

Chris Hemsworth as Thor

METACRITIC RATING:  ?

Starring: Chris Hemsworth, Natalie Portman, Anthony Hopkins, Rene Russo
Genre: Action | Adventure | Drama | Fantasy
Directed by: Kenneth Branagh
Release Date: 6 May 2011
Rating: Not yet rated.

Partially disabled medical student Dr. Donald Blake discovers his heretofore unknown true form, Thor, the Norse god of thunder. Thor is Marvel’s stab at an epic fantasy adventure, spanning from present-day Earth to the realm of Asgard. The story centers on Thor, a powerful but arrogant warrior whose reckless actions reignite an ancient war. As punishment, Thor is cast down to Earth and forced to live among humans. But once here, he learns what it takes to be a true hero when the most dangerous villain of his world sends the darkest forces of Asgard to invade Earth. (Marvel Studios)

Sir Kenneth Branagh on Thor :

“Growing up, my single comic book passion was Thor . From my time in Belfast as a kid, that’s the first time I came across that comic, really, exclusively, I don’t know why, but it struck a chord. I was drawn to it. I liked all the dynastic drama.

“Inspired by the comic book world both pictorially and compositionally at once, we’ve tried to find a way to make a virtue and a celebration of the distinction between the worlds that exist in the film but absolutely make them live in the same world. It’s about finding the framing style, the color palette, finding the texture and the amount of camera movement that helps celebrate and express the differences and the distinctions in those worlds. If it succeeds, it will mark this film as different. The combination of the primitive and the sophisticated, the ancient and the modern, I think that potentially is the exciting fusion, the exciting tension in the film.

“What’s surprising and delighting me is the way the cast, the ensemble, has fused together. It’s kind of an interesting combination of very young and very experienced people and the double-up of that, it seems to me, is there is a lot of fire in the movie. It doesn’t take itself too seriously, it doesn’t try to be too solemn.”

Posted by: Dr. Grover B. Proctor, Jr. | 17 May 2010

Viktor Frankl and the Meaning of Life


 

This vintage 4-minute clip of Viktor Frankl (at age 67) recently crossed my desk. Please watch it before reading on.

Viktor Frankl speaking at a conference in Toronto.

It might seem jarring to hear Frankl say that the redemption of a “criminal or juvenile delinquent or drug abuser” could be accomplished merely through “presupposing the ideal” of which he or she is capable—and that this is what will “make him become what he is capable of becoming.” On the face of it, this seems far too simplistic to be taken seriously.

While capable of wonderful humor (as shown in the above video), Viktor Frankl was anything but trite. His life experience had been so profound, and his intellect so great, that we rightfully came to expect penetrating insights and erudite conclusions from him.

Frankl suffered in World War II through incarceration at Theresienstadt Concentration Camp, at the hands of the brutally evil-incarnate Nazi regime. He somehow survived, but his wife and parents did not. How could someone who endured all of this horror at the hands of such wicked, malevolent people believe that the redemption of anyone–even the most wickedly evil, including the Nazis?—can be accomplished at all, much less by simply and idealistically “over-estimating and over-rating” them?

I pondered over this for some minutes, before going back to some of his writings. I found this, from his masterpiece Man’s Search for Meaning:

"Man's Search for Meaning" by Viktor Frankl“We stumbled on in the darkness, over big stones and through large puddles, along the one road leading from the [concentration] camp. The accompanying guards kept shouting at us and driving us with the butts of their rifles. Anyone with very sore feet supported himself on his neighbor’s arm. Hardly a word was spoken; the icy wind did not encourage talk. Hiding his mouth behind his upturned collar, the man marching next to me whispered suddenly: ‘If our wives could see us now! I do hope they are better off in their camps and don’t know what is happening to us.’

“That brought thoughts of my own wife to mind. And as we stumbled on for miles, slipping on icy spots, supporting each other time and again, dragging one another up and onward, nothing was said, but we both knew: each of us was thinking of his wife. Occasionally I looked at the sky, where the stars were fading and the pink light of the morning was beginning to spread behind a dark bank of clouds. But my mind clung to my wife’s image, imagining it with an uncanny acuteness. I heard her answering me, saw her smile, her frank and encouraging look. Real or not, her look was then more luminous than the sun which was beginning to rise.

“A thought transfixed me: for the first time in my life I saw the truth as it is set into song by so many poets, proclaimed as the final wisdom by so many thinkers. The truth—that love is the ultimate and the highest goal to which man can aspire. Then I grasped the meaning of the greatest secret that human poetry and human thought and belief have to impart: The salvation of man is through love and in love. I understood how a man who has nothing left in this world still may know bliss, be it only for a brief moment, in the contemplation of his beloved. In a position of utter desolation, when man cannot express himself in positive action, when his only achievement may consist in enduring his sufferings in the right way—an honorable way—in such a position man can, through loving contemplation of the image he carries of his beloved, achieve fulfillment. For the first time in my life I was able to understand the meaning of the words, ‘The angels are lost in perpetual contemplation of an infinite glory.'”

So truly, what Frankl’s wartime hell and his subsequent years as one of the world’s greatest neurologists and psychiatrists had led him to discover was this eternal truth:

Love is the ultimate answer. To every question. Period.

  • The Eternal God summarized and codified His equally eternal Law for the Israelites in the wilderness. Why? Because, as Paul would ultimately remind us in Romans 13:10, “Love is the fulfillment of the Law” (NIV) or “Love is all that the Law demands” (CEV) or “Love is the whole Law” (Darby).
  • The Creator God came down to Earth to live a blameless life in order to effect redemption, through His Grace, for all of humanity. Why? “Because God so loved the world…”
  • And how did the Father God instruct us to live our lives, ever since Creation? “Love the Eternal your God with all your heart and with all your soul and with all your strength” (Deut 6:5) and “Love your neighbor as yourself” (Lev 19:18). Grace itself is effected through and because of His love for His children. (That these two divine commandments, as well as the idea of justification through Grace, are OLD Testament precepts should not surprise us.)

Therefore, Frankl’s cognitive leap should not surprise us either: The quest for meaning in life is ultimately the search for the “Ideal”—and that “Ideal” (as Frankl discovered in the hell of Theresienstadt) is Love. The search for the “Ideal” is to search with and for Love. By extension, to be “idealistic” in considering and dealing with one’s fellow humans is to be loving towards them. For to be “idealistic” is to approach others “as they should be, as they could be.” Love expects the best, and therefore nourishes it in all of us.

So, in the end, when we “presuppose the Ideal,” when we “over-estimate and over-rate” another person, we acknowledge what is possible—and we want that ideal for the other person.

If that isn’t love, what is?

 

Posted by: Dr. Grover B. Proctor, Jr. | 17 May 2010

Galaxy Cinema: Chinese Film Series


Ni hao, film fans & friends.

If you are planning to be anywhere near central North Carolina this summer, I would strongly encourage you to attend the 2010 Chinese Film Series, featuring four fairly recent and very highly rated Chinese films. The films will be shown on Thursday nights at the independent Galaxy Cinema in Cary, and the price for the entire 4-film series is only $15 — even less if you, like Adrianne and I, are members.

In the Mood for Love

In the Mood for Love

I could not be more excited about the first film’s inclusion -– Wang Kar-wai’s evocative and hauntingly beautiful In the Mood for Love. It is one of my three all-time personal favorite Chinese films, featuring ravishing and delicately nuanced performances by Maggie Cheung and Tony Leung (who played the star-crossed martial arts lovers Flying Snow and Broken Sword in Zhang Yimou’s Hero). The New York Times said it was “voluptuous — like that first blush of love when you can barely concentrate on anything else, and the world seems new and strange…. Probably the most breathtakingly gorgeous film of the year, dizzy with a nose-against-the-glass romantic spirit…. The camera is perched like a voyeur, snatching glimpses from doorways and corners, gazing lovingly at this couple…. This film is a sweet kiss.”

Riding Alone for Thousands of Miles

Riding Alone for Thousands of Miles

Adrianne and I found the redeeming family-centered message underlyingRiding Alone for Thousands of Miles (a recent offering by Zhang Yimou, probably China’s greatest filmmaker) made for an endearing and touchingly memorable film experience. The Washington Post called it “a masterful little film, and, thanks to Zhang’s seasoned hands, it’s subtly heartfelt but never manipulative.” TheChicago Tribune said, “This is a movie for all cultures and all people, for families and especially for those who have lost them.”

Families, note: while the first two films are rated PG, and so with some parental guidance they should be appropriate for at least your older kids, the third film should be approached with discretion. Director Johnnie To’s R-rated Exiled is a gritty, grizzly Hong Kong cops story (for which both To and Hong Kong are famous). Newsweek said the film “blends sentimentality, shoot-outs and cool humor into a bewitchingly entertaining brew,” but Roger Ebert laments that director To does this genre “about as well as you’d want it to be done, unless you wanted acting and more coherence.”

Up the Yangtze

Up the Yangtze

The documentary Up the Yangtze may be unrated in America (in Singapore it was rated PG), but the critics have almost unanimously glowed in their praise of it: Variety -“A gloriously cinematic documentary of epic, poetic sadness.” New York Times -“Astonishing” Salon.com -“Spectacular. The cast of characters rival any fiction film I’ve seen recently.”Entertainment Weekly -“Sad and beautiful. An exquisitely poised small study.” Boston Globe -“Masterful and haunting.”

Xie xie…

Galaxy Cinema: Chinese Film Festival

In the Mood for Love In the Mood for Love (2000) – June 24; 7:30 p.m.
Considered by many critics and film journals to be one of the best films of the decade, this melancholic romance stars Tony Leung and Maggie Cheung, two of Hong Kong’s biggest stars. When Mr. Chow and Mrs. Chan discover that their spouses are having an affair, they find themselves drawn to each other despite the cultural mores of the 1960s. With shades of Hitchcock’s Vertigo, Wong Kar-Wai’s masterpiece is an understated look at the complexities of love, lust and memory.
Nominated for the Palme d’Or at the Cannes Film Festival. Hong Kong. 2000.
85 Metacritic rating (out of 100)
(Rated PG for thematic elements and brief language)
Riding Alone for Thousands of Miles Riding Alone For Thousands of Miles (2005)- July 8; 7:30 p.m.
Arguably the most famous Chinese filmmaker, Zhang Yimou returns to his dramatic roots in this story about Tanaka, an aged Japanese fisherman who travels to China to see his hospitalized son. His journey brings him in contact with Li, a prisoner also looking to meet his young boy. Tanaka struggles to help Li achieve his goal, at the risk of losing his own opportunity to make amends.
73 Metacritic rating (out of 100)
(Rated PG for mild thematic elements)
Exiled Exiled (2006) – July 22; 7:30 p.m.
This crime drama follows ex-criminal Wo, who is targeted for assassination by a vengeful mob boss. But when one pair of hitmen meets another sworn to protect him, their allegiances are called into question. Director Johnnie To proves again that he’s a master at choreographing action scenes which are simultaneously suspenseful and beautiful to watch unfold.
Hong Kong’s official submission for consideration at the 80th Academy Awards.
73 Metacritic rating (out of 100)
(Rated R for strong violence and some sexual content)
Up the Yangtze Up The Yangtze (2007) – August 5; 7:30 p.m.
[ Documentary ] The feature film debut of Canadian director Yung Chang, this documentary follows several rural workers in the province of Hubei and how they are affected by the building of the Three Gorges Dam. It’s a thought-provoking and moving look at a rapidly-changing nation struggling to transition into a consumer capitalist economy.
Winner of the Emerging Artist award at the Full Frame Documentary Film Festival.
84 Metacritic rating (out of 100)
(Not rated in USA)
Posted by: Dr. Grover B. Proctor, Jr. | 30 April 2010

The Film of Kells… (it’s good, but the book was better)


There probably was never much doubt that Up would win this year’s Academy Award for Best Animated Feature Film. Through the collected genius at Disney/Pixar and DreamWorks, Hollywood basically has a lock on major, amazing, delightful, deserving, fan-favorite animation these days.

But it’s the international competition for the animation prize which can be most surprising.

From the film version of The Book of Kells

From the film version of The Book of Kells

The Secret of Kells (listed as a product of France-Belgium-Ireland) was also up for this year’s Oscar, and it is now showing at “select theaters” in America. (Galaxy in Cary and Colony in Raleigh, for those of you in central NC)

We haven’t seen it yet (though, with Adrianne’s wonderful skills as a calligrapher, I’m sure we will!), but I thought I would bring it to your attention. The reviews are almost all positive, and virtually every one of them has a form of the word “gorgeous” in it somewhere. (It won “Best Irish Film” at last year’s Dublin International Film Festival.)

By the way, if you’re truly a UK film buff, you may recognize the voice of Brendan Gleeson in this film as Abbot Cellach. Who, you may ask, is Brendan Gleeson when he’s at home? He played Professor Alastor ‘Mad Eye’ Moody in the Harry Potter series.

So, yes, the Film of Kells is no doubt wonderful, but the book is, of course, a masterpiece. Scroll down to the bottom of this article for a hint at its timeless beauty.

The Secret of Kells

METACRITIC RATING: 82

Genre: Adventure | Animation
Directed by: Tomm Moore & Nora Twomey
Running Time: 75 minutes
Rating: Not rated in America, but given a PG in Ireland, Australia and Singapore

Magic, fantasy, and Celtic mythology come together in a riot of color and detail that dazzle the eyes, in a sweeping story about the power of imagination and faith to carry humanity through dark times. Young Brendan lives in a remote medieval outpost under siege from barbarian raids. But a new life of adventure beckons when a celebrated master illuminator arrives from foreign lands carrying an ancient but unfinished book, brimming with secret wisdom and powers. To help complete the magical book, Brendan has to overcome his deepest fears and venture into the enchanted forest where mythical creatures hide. It is here that he meets the fairy Aisling, a mysterious young wolf-girl, who helps him fulfill his dangerous quest. (GKIDS distributor in America; Les Armateurs production company in France)

Wall Street Journal Joe Morgenstern:
This wonderfully strange and exquisite little feature was created, especially for young children, to celebrate the book through another kind of illumination that’s been falling into disuse — hand-drawn animation.

The New York Times A.O. Scott:
It is only fitting that a movie concerned with the power and beauty of drawing — the almost sacred magic of color and line — should be so gorgeously and intricately drawn.

Salon.com Andrew O’Hehir:
A gorgeous transcription of medieval decorative art and its themes into a contemporary animated narrative, one that should enthrall children older than 8 or so, along with the adults lucky enough to watch with them.

NPR Bob Mondello:
There’s something kind of captivating about a film that’s been painstakingly drawn to glorify the craft of illustration, and that’s comfortable using retro techniques. Because after all, what else makes sense for bringing to life the gold and scarlet ornamentation in ancient manuscripts?

The film version of The Book of Kells

The film version of The Book of Kells

___________________________

Below are two samples from Leabhar Cheanannais , otherwise known as The Book of Kells.

 

The Book of Kells

 

The Book of Kells

Posted by: Dr. Grover B. Proctor, Jr. | 9 January 2010

The 1040 Gun Hoax


If you haven’t already, you may soon be forwarded by someone you know a hoax email titled “Look what’s on your the 2010 Tax Return” [sic]. It is full of lies, distortions, and half-truths. (I have reproduced the original viral email in its entirety at the bottom of this essay.)

The email in question asserts that the Obama administration has passed legislation which would require gun owners to list all their guns on their 1040 income tax form and pay a $50 tax on each one. And, of course, it’s simply not true. (In case you have to ask and you believe it’s relevant, no, I am not a supporter of the current administration nor of 99% of its agenda.)

There are two reasons I can think of why someone would deliberately create an untruth such as this email:

  • The hoaxer was an opponent of the current administration, and wanted people to believe the worst about it, regardless of the ethical problems involved with barefaced lying; or
  • The hoaxer was a supporter of the current administration, and wanted to make right-wingers salivate with something so blatantly bogus and easily exposed, that they could yell, “See? All of the attacks on the administration are LIES!”

Either way, those of us on the Right of the political spectrum need only search for the TRUTH. Exposing lies, from whatever source, can only strengthen our moral position. The Truth is more than enough to win the day. It will truly set us free.

Here are the worst of the deceptions of the email, and what the truth is:

LIE: “Look What’s on the 2010 Tax Return: Now ALL GUNS must be listed on your next (2010) tax return! Senate Bill SB-2099 will require us…”
TRUTH: Senate Bill 2099 from the 111th (current) Congress is a bill “To suspend temporarily the duty on certain heaters.” (And that’s heaters as in those used in “the interior and windshield of electrically powered vehicles” – NOT heaters as slang for “guns”!)
And lest anyone think they were referencing Senate Bill 2099 from a recent Congress, S-2099 from the 110th Congress (2007-2008) was the “Preserving Access to Laboratory Services Act of 2007” and S-2099 from the 109th Congress (2005-2006) was the “Spent Nuclear Fuel On-Site Storage Security Act of 2005.” (You’ll see below that “SB2099” is an inert, ancient, dead, buried, and forgotten piece of history.)
Replying to the specific question “Is it true that Senate Bill SB-2099 will require owners of firearms to pay a $50 charge per gun and list each gun on their federal tax form?” even the US Senate’s own website goes to great pains to assert that there is no such legislation being considered by the Senate.
SOURCES: U.S. Government Printing OfficeU.S. Senate

LIE: “Senate Bill SB-2099 will require us to put on our 2009 1040 federal tax form all guns that you have or own.” (from the “I Can’t Even Be Internally Consistent about Dates in my Own Hoax Email” Department!)
TRUTH: The IRS has long-since created and published the 2009 version of the 1040. And nowhere on it do the letters “gun” appear together in any context.
SOURCE: IRS

LIE: “Gun owners… look what’s on the 2010 tax return / VERIFIED – TRUE by snopes.com”
TRUTH: This is a blatant and total lie. Snopes.com specifically calls this SB2099 allegation “FALSE”! Here’s what they report: “The referenced bill, SB 2099 (the Handgun Safety and Registration Act) is not currently before Congress. It was introduced to the Senate back in February 2000 (not 2009), and it was referred to the Committee on Finance, where it languished without ever coming to a vote. It also had no provisions for requiring handgun owners to list their guns on federal income tax returns.”
What the hoaxer has done is splice together lying information about this never-passed Senate bill together with information about a House bill that calls for stricter registration of handguns (see below) – as if somehow they jointly verify each other.
SOURCE: Snopes.com

LIE: “VERIFIED – TRUE by snopes.com … Obama’s Congress is now starting on the firearms confiscation bill. If it passes, gun owners will become criminals if you don’t fully comply. It has begun … Whatever Obama’s ‘Secret Master Plan’ is … this is just the ‘tip of the iceberg!’ Very Important for you to be aware of a new bill HR 45 introduced into the House. This is the Blair Holt Firearm Licensing & Record of Sale Act of 2009.”
TRUTH: While it is true that there is a bill (languishing in House Subcommittee on Crime, Terrorism, and Homeland Security) called HR 45 “Blair Holt’s Firearm Licensing and Record of Sale Act of 2009,” Snopes.com has revised its verdict of the information in this part of the email from “True” to “Partly True.” While there is a lot to be concerned about in this bill for many people (though our hoaxer has even lied about its contents; see below), there seems to be little chance of this bill ever becoming law.
SOURCE: U.S. Government Printing OfficeSnopes.com

LIE: “Even gun shop owners didn’t know about this because the government is trying to fly it under the radar as a ‘minor’ IRS revision, and, as usual, the ‘political’ lawmakers did not read this bill before signing and approving it!”
TRUTH: Which is it, hoaxer – a not-yet-passed bill or a “signed and approved” law? According to ESPN Outdoors correspondent Wade Bourne (as quoted by Snopes.com), the chance of this bill becoming law is virtually nil:
“Pro-gun activists are vigilant but don’t seem overly worried about it. They point out that the bill’s failure to attract co-sponsors is an indication of a lack of enthusiasm for it among other congressmen. They feel it is too far-reaching and repressive of gun owners’ rights to merit serious consideration by a majority of Congress. Lawrence Keane of the NSSF [National Shooting Sports Foundation] states, ‘If this bill passes, Democrats would likely lose (control of) their chamber in upcoming mid-term elections (2010). The leadership in the House knows that.’ Keane says some 80 million-plus U.S. citizens own firearms, representing nearly half the households in the nation. He believes that House Democrats will allow the Blair Holt bill to die in subcommittee rather than risk the ire of so many pro-gun voters.”
SOURCE: Snopes.com

LIE: “Basically this would make it illegal to own a firearm – any rifle with a clip or ANY pistol unless… You will submit to a physical & mental evaluation at any time of their choosing.”
TRUTH: Under the bill, should it (against all odds) ever become law, applicants for handgun registration would only have to authorize the release of any existing mental health records.
SOURCE: Snopes.com

LIE: “They would have the right to come and inspect that you are storing your gun safely away from cessibility [sic] to children and fine [sic] is punishable for up to 5 years in prison.”
TRUTH: Under the bill, should it (against all odds) ever become law, the right of inspection to ascertain compliance with the law would apply to “any place in which firearms or firearm products are manufactured, stored, or held, for distribution in commerce,” not to ordinary households.
SOURCE: Snopes.com

“You will know the truth, and the truth will make you free.”
JOHN 8:32 (NASB)

(Here’s the original, uncut, unabridged viral email, as I received it.)

PASS THIS OFF TO ALL GUN OWNERS THAT YOU KNOW OF.

THIS COUNTRY IS HEADED FOR SOCIALISM.
BELIEVE ME WE ARE ABOUT THERE.

Look What’s on the 2010 Tax Return

Gun owners… look what’s on the 2010 tax return

VERIFIED – TRUE by snopes.com

http://www.snopes.com/politics/guns/blairholt.asp

As if we didn’t have enough to get upset about! If you have a gun, I hope it isn’t registered!

It begins … more Freedom gone …. the right to protect yourself and your family gone! Now ALL GUNS must be listed on your next (2010) tax return!

Senate Bill SB-2099 will require us to put on our 2009 1040 federal tax form all guns that you have or own. It will require fingerprints and a tax of $50 per gun. This bill was introduced on February 24, 2009, by the Obama staff. BUT, this bill will only become public knowledge 30 days after the new law becomes effective! This is an amendment to the Internal Revenue Act of 1986. This means that the Finance Committee has passed this without the Senate voting on it at all. Trust Obama? You must be kidding!

The full text of the IRS amendment is on the U.S. Senate homepage: http://www.senate..gov. You can find the bill by doing a search by the bill number, SB-2099.. You know who to call; I strongly suggest you do. Please send a copy of this e-mail to every gun owner you know.

Text of H.R.45 as Introduced in House: Blair Holt’s Firearm Licensing and Record of Sale Act of 2009: http://www.opencongress.org/bill/111-h45/text

Obama’s Congress is now starting on the firearms confiscation bill. If it passes, gun owners will become criminals if you don’t fully comply.

It has begun … Whatever Obama’s “Secret Master Plan” is … this is just the ‘tip of the iceberg!’

Very Important for you to be aware of a new bill HR 45 introduced into the House. This is the Blair Holt Firearm Licensing & Record of Sale Act of 2009.

Even gun shop owners didn’t know about this because the government is trying to fly it under the radar as a ‘minor’ IRS revision, and, as usual, the ‘political’ lawmakers did not read this bill before signing and approving it!

To find out about this – go to any government website and type in HR 45 or Goggle HR 45 Blair Holt Firearm Licensing & Record of Sales Act of 2009. You will get all the information.

Basically this would make it illegal to own a firearm – any rifle with a clip or ANY pistol unless:
1) It is registered
2) You are fingerprinted
3) You supply a current Driver’s License
4) You supply your Social Security number
5) You will submit to a physical & mental evaluation at any time of their choosing

Each update change or ownership through private or public sale must be reported and costs $25. Failure to do so you automatically lose the right to own a firearm and are subject up to a year in jail.

There is a child provision clause on page 16 section 305 stating a child-access provision.. Gun must be locked and inaccessible to any child under 18. They would have the right to come and inspect that you are storing your gun safely away from cessibility to children and fine is punishable for up to 5 years in prison.

If you think this is a joke – go to the website and take your pick of many options to read this. It is long and lengthy. But, more and more people are becoming aware of this. Pass the word along. Any hunters in your family pass this along.

This is just a “termite” approach to complete confiscation of guns and disarming of our society to the point we have no defense – chip away a little here and there until the goal is accomplished before anyone realizes it.

This is one to act on whether you own a gun or not.

Search Results – THOMAS (Library of Congress) “http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c111:H.R.45>

H.R.45: Blair Holt’s Firearm Licensing and Record of Sale Act of 2009

U.S. Congress – OpenCongress http://www.opencongress.org/bill/111-h45/show>

H..R.45: Blair Holt’s Firearm Licensing and Record of Sale Act of 2009 (GovTrack.us) “http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=h111-45>

Please copy and send this out to EVERYONE in the USA, whether you support the Right to Bear Arms or are for gun control.
We all should have the right to choose.

Posted by: Dr. Grover B. Proctor, Jr. | 4 January 2010

Alert: Jump (onto Sundance) Tomorrow


If you have cable/dish and have access to the Sundance film channel, then tonight before you go to bed, set your video recorder!

Tunde Adebimpe

Tunde Adebimpe

In 1998 Joel Hopkins, when he was a youthful 28 years old, wrote and directed his first commercial film. It was a quirky, captivating little 30-minute short (creatively conceived and imaginatively shot) called Jorge, in which he introduced us to the painfully shy but thoroughly engaging character of the same name, in his quest for the lovely Alicia. Alicia is a temp in the travel agency where Jorge works, and just as quickly as she entered his life, the ending of her job threatens to take her away forever. Newcomer Tunde Adebimpe gave a sweet, understated, appropriately angular, and nearly perfect reading, through which he and director Hopkins created a character that made us shout “More!”

Natalia Verbeke

Natalia Verbeke

Well, guess what? Thanks in part to the $100,000 Hopkins received for winning NYU’s Wasserman Award forJorge, three years later he re-wrote and expanded the premise and concept of the Jorge saga, brought Adebimpe back to brilliantly reprise the role, and gave us the 97-minute Jump Tomorrow. Jorge once again meets and pursues Alicia, but this time the demure Alicia — as played by Loreni Delgado in Jorge — is replaced by the independent and (we later learn) fiery Alicia of actress Natalia Verbeke. Jorge pursues Alicia, not just in the office and elevator and public transport as he did in the first film, but all the way to the Canadian border. The Cupid of the piece, who pulls Jorge out of his introversion (even though love has kicked his own metaphorical shins) is played by famed French actor Hippolyte Girardot (La MoustacheParis je t’aime).

Tunde Adebimpe & Hippolyte Girardot

Tunde Adebimpe & Hippolyte Girardot

Mostly the critics never wrote up (if they even saw)Jorge, but those critics willing to be taken to new and engaging cinematic experiences in pursuit of a left-handed comedic feel good romance had almost universally positive things to say about Jump Tomorrow. See Joe Morgenstern’s review below. The New York Times looked down its dour patrician nose at what it called Jump Tomorrow‘s “raggedy low-budget” look, though even they were forced to applaud its “sweetness.”

Joe Morgenstern ended his 2001 review of Jump Tomorrow by saying it made him eager to know what Joel Hopkins would do next. Well, it would take 7 years, but he found out when Hopkins wrote and directed the big-budget Dustin Hoffman/Emma Thompson vehicle Last Chance Harvey. The critics weren’t always terribly kind aboutHarvey (Roger Ebert: “a tremendously appealing love story surrounded by a movie not worthy of it”; Morgenstern: “A good chance to see two superb actors having their way with wafer-thin material”), but I’m still on the edge of my cinematic seat, wondering if we’ll ever see Jorge again!

Here’s the showing info for Jump Tomorrow: Sundance Channel; 8:30 am or 4:00 pm, Tuesday, 5 January 2010. (If you don’t live in Eastern or Pacific time zones, check your listings.)

And if you’re intrigued to see the original Jorge, scroll to the bottom of this post. You can watch it in two 15-minute segments. Enjoy!

Now, GO SET YOUR DVR!

Jump Tomorrow

Jump Tomorrow

Jump Tomorrow

METACRITIC RATING:  68

Starring: Tunde Adebimpe, Hippolyte Girardot, Natalia Verbeke
Genre: Romance
Directed by: Joel Hopkins
Running Time: 97 minutes
Rated:  PG for thematic material, mild sensuality and language

George, a shy and introverted young man from Nigeria, is following tradition leading to an arranged marriage. He meets and falls in love with a beautiful girl, who is also about to be married, and begins to question his future.

Jump Tomorrow

Jump Tomorrow

Wall Street Journal Joe Morgenstern (rating: 40):
The silliness of Jump Tomorrow takes your breath away, and I mean that as high praise. So does the sweetness. And the drollery, and audacity. A delightful debut feature by Joel Hopkins, it’s a deadpan comedy about the triumph of true love over shyness; he who hesitates is found. The movie’s minimalist look reflects the emotional minimalism of its covertly romantic hero, George, who is played by Tunde Adebimpe. George is black, a Nigerian living in the U.S., but his blackness is a red herring; his most salient characteristic is a goofy melancholy that keeps him buttoned up inside his business suit, arms dangling as he walks, face impassive behind horn-rimmed specs. “I don’t think my face makes much sense without my glasses,” George says forlornly.
Maybe not, but what he does after missing his fiancee’s airport arrival makes perfect sense. George meets and promptly falls in love with an irresistible young woman named Alicia — she’s played with spirit and grace by a Spanish actress named Natalia Verbecke. Then Jump Tomorrow becomes a picaresque road movie as George, accompanied by a romantic fool of a Frenchman named Gerard (Hippolyte Girardot), follows Alicia, and her own fiance, all the way to the Canadian border. Don’t expect a perfectly wrought film when you see Jump Tomorrow, but do see it by all means, both for itself and for what it foretells — great things — of Mr. Hopkins’s future. I can’t wait to see what he does next.

Chicago Sun-Times Roger Ebert (rating: 75):
The plot unfolds with the gradual richness of something by Eric Rohmer, who has the whole canvas in view from the beginning but uncovers it a square inch at a time. By the end of Jump Tomorrow I was awfully fond of the picture.

Chicago Reader Lisa Alspector:
Transcendently kitschy, trippingly funny fairy tale, which has a surprising amount of psychological insight and a dance number to die for.


Jorge Part 1


Jorge Part 2

Posted by: Dr. Grover B. Proctor, Jr. | 7 December 2009

Blindsided


I suspected, after reading Megan Basham’s review (excerpted below), that the film The Blind Side would be worth seeing. So Adrianne and I went this weekend, and we were truly blindsided by a film abundantly rich in its humanity and unabashedly Christian in its underpinnings — a modern day object lesson in Luke 10:25-37 and Matthew 25:31-47.

Not only that, it’s a true story.

Sandra Bullock

Sandra Bullock

You can read the synopsis of the plot below. What that won’t tell you is that Sandra Bullock (commanding and authentic, in what critic Elias Savada called “Her finest performance. Ever.”) and Quinton Aaron (in an appropriately understated but amazingly subtle and nuanced performance) will steal your heart away. There are plenty of Kleenex moments, but this cinematic stew has been well seasoned with its fair share of laugh-out-loud humor as well. (You can watch the trailer at the bottom of this article.)

Its moderate Metacritic rating (53) reflects the fact that it was admired by those who accept (and often approve of) the film’s message and intent, while it was panned by those (often mainstream) critics who feel every film must address “pervasive racism in America” every time a Black actor appears in a major role. (For example, there are these criticisms: “[The movie] begs off any serious investigation of race.” and “This sports drama never strays from the surface, never exploring more complicated socioeconomic and racial issues.”) The film’s appropriate race-blind perspective is summed up brilliantly by Director John Lee Hancock: “Leigh Anne Touhy didn’t stop that car to pick up that kid because he was African-American. She stopped that car to pick up that kid because he was cold.”

In its third weekend, The Blind Side did what few movies do — it has climbed to the top spot in the box office rankings after two weekends in second place. Clearly, news of the innate beauty, charm, and inspiration of this film is spreading. Do yourself a favor and take your family to see it.

The Blind SideThe Blind Side

METACRITIC RATING:  53

Starring: Sandra Bullock, Tim McGraw, Quinton Aaron
Genre: Drama
Directed by: John Lee Hancock
Running Time: 126 minutes
Rated: PG-13 for one scene involving brief violence, drug and sexual references

Teenager Michael Oher [pronounced “oar”] is surviving on his own, virtually homeless, when he is spotted on the street by Leigh Anne Tuohy. Learning that the young man is one of her daughter’s classmates, Leigh Anne insists that Michael — wearing shorts and a t-shirt in the dead of winter — come out of the cold. Without a moment’s hesitation, she invites him to stay at the Tuohy home for the night. What starts out as a gesture of kindness turns into something more as Michael becomes part of the Tuohy family despite the differences in their backgrounds. Living in his new environment, the teen faces a completely different set of challenges to overcome. And as the family helps Michael fulfill his potential, both on and off the football field, Michael’s presence in the Tuohy’s lives leads them to some insightful self-discoveries of their own. (Warner Bros.

World Magazine Megan Basham (excerpts from her extended review):
After the screening [of the film], many critics were, like me, dabbing their eyes and shared my feeling that The Blind Side is a classic old Hollywood-style film that is well-written, nicely-paced, and wonderfully acted, in addition to being hilarious and heart-warming. After all, it’s a movie about the best in humanity and how, if those who are blessed with financial and spiritual resources reach out and share those blessings, they can change the course of someone’s life for good. What’s not to cheer about that?
The  Blind Side[Predictably, not all critics agreed, including a friend of this Basham whose world view is “diametrical opposite” from hers.] “It’s formulaic,” he opined. I countered: “Why, because it is about an athlete overcoming great odds to reach even greater success? There are countless movies about singers/actors/painters who drink and drug themselves to death. They are all also true stories. We don’t call them formulaic. We give them Oscars.”
My friend had another objection. “It’s racist,” he argued. How so? “It’s about a black man who can only succeed if a white woman saves him.” Yet, I answered, it’s also what actually happened. If the story were about a white woman who passed a freezing black kid by, would it then not be racist? I put the question to [the film’s director John Lee] Hancock.
“There will always be a certain camp that will say, ‘Oh, it’s paternalism; its white guilt; it’s another one of those stories that says an African-American can’t make it on his own.’ I think it’s all balderdash,” said Hancock. “Leigh Anne Touhy didn’t stop that car to pick up that kid because he was African-American. She stopped that car to pick up that kid because he was cold.”
Michael Oher and familyHancock then echoed my own belief that some viewers are contemptuous of emotionally uplifting story arcs no matter how based in reality: “I think some people are so cynical that anytime they find themselves moved, they turn around and go, ‘You must have manipulated me.’ And of course there’s the hip, cool quotient. If some people in the film community think I don’t have street cred because I try to make honest, moving films, then fine. If they want to call it corny, fine. This is a great story, and it’s a true story. If what the Touhys did is somehow corny, I hope there are a lot more corny people out there.”

________________________________________

Notes from Grover:
(1) This last picture above is of the real Michael Oher, with his family, on the day he was a first-round draft choice of the Baltimore Ravens.
(2) Below is the trailer for The Blind Side:

Posted by: Dr. Grover B. Proctor, Jr. | 20 November 2009

‘Red Cliff’: A Visual Symphony


A landmark Chinese film has finally made it to American shores, although in truncated form. (What else is new?) The costume drama / epic historical film Red Cliff, which chronicles the legends surrounding the famous Battle of Chibi of the Han Dynasty in 208 A.D., was directed by legendary director John Woo.

Tony Leung & Wei Zhao

Tony Leung & Wei Zhao

It isn’t playing here yet, but I will see any film with Chinese actor Tony Leung Chiu Wai in it. You may remember him from Zhang Yimou’s visually stunning martial arts drama Hero, the lyrically beautiful In the Mood for Love, its surreal companion 2046, and Ang Lee’s Lust, Caution.

The film also boasts the beautiful actress Wei Zhao, who has starred in the action movie So Close as one of a pair of sisters-turned-assassins, in the comedy-kungfu hit Shaolin Soccer as Stephen Chow’s love interest, and in the epic drama Warriors of Heaven and Earth.

Red Cliff was originally released as two films in Asia totaling 5 hours, but the American release has been whittled to a bare 2-and-a-half-hour single movie. (Wall Street Journal film critic Joe Morgenstern says you’ll be wanting more.) Much has been made (see below) about this film being, to date, the most expensive ever made in China. True, but perhaps more telling, it is also the highest grossing film ever in China, as well. The film is in “limited release” here, so good luck in finding it.

Red Cliff

Joe Morgenstern has called this film “a legendary filmmaker’s visual symphony.” Certainly the trailer hints at an astoundingly beautiful and eye-poppingly huge epic. Failing finding it in the theaters, maybe Blu-Ray will do it some justice. (See below for excerpts from Morgenstern’s review, a link to the HD trailer, and information on findingRed Cliff in four different versions and/or formats at Amazon.com.)

 

Red CliffRed Cliff  [Chi Bi]

METACRITIC RATING: 75

Starring: Tony Leung , Takeshi Kaneshiro, Wei Zhao
Genre: Action | Adventure | Drama | War
Directed by: John Woo
Running Time: 148 minutes
Language: Mandarin
Rated:  R for sequences of epic warfare

Red Cliff opens as power hungry Prime Minister-turned-General Cao Cao seeks permission from the Han dynasty Emperor to organize a southward-bound mission designed to crush Liu Bei and Sun Quan, the two troublesome warlords who stand in his way. As the expedition gets underway, Cao Cao’s troops rain destruction on Liu Bei’s army, forcing him into retreat. Liu Bei’s military strategist Zhuge Liang knows that the rebels’ only hope for survival is to form an alliance with rival warlord Sun Quan, and reaches out to Sun Quan’s trusted advisor, war hero Zhou Yu. Vastly outnumbered by Cao Cao’s brutal, fast-approaching army, the warlords band together to mount a heroic campaign — unrivaled in history — that changes the face of China forever. A massive hit in Asia and the most expensive Asian film production of all time, Red Cliff is a breathtaking war epic that marks the triumphant return of John Woo. (Magnolia Pictures)

Wall Street Journal Joe Morgenstern (90):
Set in the twilight of the Han Dynasty, Red Cliff lends new meaning to the notion of “Baby on Board” when a fearless swordsman plunges into battle with an infant strapped on his back. This action spectacular, directed by the masterful John Woo, also lends new meaning to the notion of epic. As the most expensive movie ever made in China, it’s certainly immense and, even in the truncated (and sometimes slightly frayed) form shown here, quite long — 2.5 hours, rather than five hours for the two-part version shown to Asian audiences. Yet the immensity encompasses such variety, subtlety and intimacy that you may find yourself yearning for more.
Red CliffIn one example of many, two distinguished warriors meet to decide whether to join forces against the tyrannical emperor. Once they discover that they’re both musicians, they signify their decision by playing a duet on traditional stringed instruments. In a lesser film the duet might be no more than a pretty gesture. In this one it’s a daringly extended interlude with as much dramatic development, in its way, as Mr. Woo has devoted to some of the intricately conceived battles, or to an astonishing sequence in which a homing pigeon leads the camera on an eye-popping survey of the dictator’s troops. Red Cliff is a legendary filmmaker’s visual symphony.

__________________________________________

Notes from Grover:

Watch the HD Trailer for Red Cliff below. Below the Youtube box for the trailer, you’ll find links for the various versions and DVD formats in which Red Cliff is available. Click on any of them to see further information about it at Amazon.com.

Red Cliff-U.S.-Blu-Ray
U.S. Theatrical Version
1 Part
Blu-Ray
148 minutes
Red Cliff-Int'l.-Blu-Ray
Original Int’l. Version
Parts I & II
Blu-Ray
288 minutes
Red Cliff-U.S.-DVD
U.S. Theatrical Version
1 Part
Blu-Ray
148 minutes
Red Cliff-Int'l.-DVD
Original Int’l. Version
Parts I & II
Blu-Ray
288 minutes


Posted by: Dr. Grover B. Proctor, Jr. | 28 June 2009

The White Man and the Latina Woman


Supreme Court Associate Justice designate Sonia SotomayorHere is the now-famous 2001 assertion from Supreme Court Associate Justice designate Sonia Sotomayor, as quoted by The New York Times:

“I would hope that a wise Latina woman with the richness of her experiences would more often than not reach a better conclusion than a white male who hasn’t lived that life.”

There’s been a lot of controversy about this quote. In order to find out exactly why that might be, let’s take a look at it again — this time with a couple of parts made more “generic”:

“I would hope that a wise [ insert ethnic and gender reference here ] with the richness of … experiences would more often than not reach a better conclusion than a [ insert ethnic and gender reference here ] who hasn’t lived that life.”

Excuse me? I thought we as a society had moved beyond comparisons between (or referencing) ethnicity and gender. Apparently not…

Let’s assume, for the sake of argument, that Judge Sotomayor intended absolutely no ethnicity or gender comparisons here. What does the statement yield now? Paraphrased, it now says: “She hopes [expects?] that a person with ‘richness of experiences’ would ‘reach a better conclusion’ than a person ‘who hasn’t lived that life’.” Since this statement was in a judicial context, she appears to be saying that “better conclusions” (judicial opinions?) are dependent on “richness of experiences” in life.

Experiences in what area(s)? Defined as “rich” by what criteria? How does she evaluate, adjudicate, and rank my “rich experiences” with the “rich experiences” of person X? And if person Y were judged to have “less rich” experiences than person Z — but Y has a law degree from, oh, say Harvard — would the degree trump the “rich experiences” as qualifications to sit on the Supreme Court? Murky waters, these. And since we will probably not agree on who is the arbiter and on what criteria will be used, it appears to be a slippery slope.

But let’s return to our first concern. It does, in fact, appear that the ethnicity and gender references she made were important to her argument, as she went to great pains to use them for comparitive purposes. Does this not smack of the same mindset which has spawned “reverse discrimination” issues in our society? (The stereotypical example from reverse discrimination litigation goes something like this: Person A may have better qualifications, test scores, and/or evaluations, but we have decided to give the promotion to Person B because B comes from a particular ethniticy or gender which has experienced oppression, and is therefore more deserving.)

Imagine the firestorm that would have (appropriately) ensued had the quote been this (which would have been equally logically, if not factually, valid):

“I would hope that a wise White male with the richness of his experiences would more often than not reach a better conclusion than a Latina woman who hasn’t lived that life.”

YIKES!!

« Newer Posts - Older Posts »

Categories